Prosecutors to resolve Thanathorn’s destiny on November four following vaccine feedback

On November four, prosecutors will resolve whether or not to indict Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit over comments he made about Thailand’s AstraZeneca technology-transfer deal. At the beginning of the yr, the founder of the Progressive Movement criticised the federal government for being overly-reliant on Siam Bioscience for Covid-19 vaccines.
The Bangkok Post stories that Thanathorn faces charges of violating Thailand’s defamation regulation and the Computer Crime Act, but essentially the most serious charge is that of lèse-majesté. The lèse-majesté regulation, or part 112 of the Criminal Code, prohibits criticising, defaming or in any other case disrespecting the monarchy and carries some harsh punishments.
On Bonus , Thanathorn used a Facebook Live broadcast to query the awarding of the AstraZeneca contract to Siam Bioscience, by means of a expertise transfer take care of the manufacturer. Siam Bioscience is wholly owned by a subsidiary of the Crown Property Bureau. In the Facebook video, Thanathorn known as on the agency and the government to share particulars of the technology-transfer settlement to show it had been dealt with transparently.
The Bangkok Post reports that expenses of lèse-majesté, violation of the Computer Crime Act, and violation of the defamation legislation were subsequently filed by Apiwat Khanthong from a government committee charged with investigating the spread of disinformation in relation to the PM and his administration. Thanathorn’s lawyer, Krissadang Nutjaras, says prosecutors are being asked to confirm if Apiwat has the authority to deliver such charges or to seek Thanathorn’s prosecution.
Krissadang has pointed out the similarity with an earlier case towards Thanathorn, in which the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society had petitioned the Criminal Court to order the elimination of the aforementioned Facebook video. In that case, the courtroom rejected the request, ruling that the content of the video did not violate Thailand’s lèse-majesté law..

Leave a Comment